EJVES Extra
Volume 18, Issue 4 , Pages 41-43 , October 2009

Lymphedema after Greater Saphenous Vein Surgery

  • M.V. Heitink

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +31 43 3875292; fax: +31 43 3877293.
  • ,
  • G.W.H. Schurink

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • C.D.J.M. de Pont

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • M.J.P.G. van Kroonenburgh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • J.C.J.M. Veraart

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands

Received 4 March 2009 ,Accepted 26 June 2009.

  • Image Result

    Lymphoscintigraphic evaluation in patients A, B and C. The asterix (*) indicates the operated leg, the arrow (↓) points to the bladder. The panel shows radioactivity in the inguinal nodes 2h after inj

    Lymphoscintigraphic evaluation in patients A, B and C. The asterix (*) indicates the operated leg, the arrow (↓) points to the bladder. The panel shows radioactivity in the inguinal nodes 2h after injection. In patient A, the uptake was normal on the right side (14%) and diminished on the left (operated) side (1.7%). Patient B had diminished uptake bilaterally, left 2.5%, and right 2.0%. Patient C also had bilaterally diminished uptake, left 4.4% and right 0.3%.

PII: S1533-3167(09)00023-5

doi: 10.1016/j.ejvsextra.2009.06.001

EJVES Extra
Volume 18, Issue 4 , Pages 41-43 , October 2009